The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6960•Metkel Alana v. OFFICER ROSE, Corrections Officer
20-6960Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 22, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6960
METKEL ALANA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER ROSE, Corrections Officer; TERESA MEADE, Corrections Officer; J.
TURNER, Corrections Officer,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Department of Corrections,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Senior District Judge. (7:18-cv-00420-GEC-PMS)
Submitted: February 22, 2021 Decided: March 22, 2021
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Metkel Alana, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Metkel Alana, a Virginia prisoner who filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the
Director of the Department of Corrections (“the Director”) and three corrections officers,
appeals the district court’s orders granting the Director’s motion to dismiss and granting
the officers’ summary judgment motion. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Alana v. Rose, No. 7:18-cv-00420-GEC-PMS (W.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2019; June 8, 2020). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.