The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6966•Felicia R. Glass v. Claudette Hankerson
20-6966Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6966
FELICIA R. GLASS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CLAUDETTE HANKERSON,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
NCCIW; MS. ALSOP; JIHAN BROWN; MR. RUSSO,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03127-BO)
Submitted: May 26, 2021 Decided: June 3, 2021
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Felicia R. Glass, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Felicia R. Glass appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant Hankerson’s
motion for summary judgment and dismissing Glass’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure
to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Glass v.
Hankerson, No. 5:17-ct-03127-BO (E.D.N.C. May 7, 2020). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.