The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-6979•United States of America v. James Thomas Oxendine, a/k/a Ox, a/k/a Ox Cuttar
20-6979Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 5, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6979
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES THOMAS OXENDINE, a/k/a Ox, a/k/a Ox Cuttar,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00051-JPJ-1; 1:13-cr-00036-JPJ-4)
Submitted: February 26, 2021 Decided: March 5, 2021
Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Thomas Oxendine, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Thomas Oxendine appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Oxendine, Nos. 1:08-cr-00051-JPJ-1; 1:13-cr-00036-JPJ-4
(W.D. Va. June 17, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.