Arnett Thomas v. ROBERT LUCKING; NOGO, Dr.; CHARLOTTE MEDICAL CENTER

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7019
ARNETT THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT LUCKING; NOGO, Dr.; CHARLOTTE MEDICAL CENTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard Ernest Myers, II, District Judge. (5:20-ct-03160-M)
Submitted: January 19, 2021 Decided: January 21, 2021
Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arnett Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Arnett Thomas appeals the district court’s order dismissing, without prejudice,
Thomas’ complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau
of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).* On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised
in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Thomas’ informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The
informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited
to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court dismissed the complaint without prejudice, we have
jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 615 (4th Cir.
2020), petition for cert. filed, No. 20-759 (U.S. Nov. 27, 2020).

-- 2 of 2 --