The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7080•United States of America v. Rajul Ruhbayan, a/k/a Creme, a/k/a James Vernon Wood, a/k/a James Vernette Johnson,…
20-7080Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 23, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7080
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RAJUL RUHBAYAN, a/k/a Creme, a/k/a James Vernon Wood, a/k/a James
Vernette Johnson, a/k/a Kreem, a/k/a Day-Ja, a/k/a Deja, a/k/a Amir Ruhbayan,
a/k/a Jibra’el Ruh’alamin, a/k/a Jibrael Ruhalamin,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:02-cr-00029-RBS-FBS-1)
Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: December 23, 2020
Before KING and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rajul Ruhbayan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rajul Ruhbayan appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for a
reduction in sentence and for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Ruhbayan, No. 2:02-cr-00029-RBS-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2020). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.