The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7227•A. C. Jackson v. Mark J. Bolster
20-7227Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 11, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7227
A. C. JACKSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MARK J. BOLSTER,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-01349-TSE-JFA)
Submitted: April 29, 2021 Decided: May 11, 2021
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
A. C. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
A.C. Jackson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order construing his 28
U.S.C. § 2241 petition as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and dismissing it on that
basis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Bolster, No. 1:19-cv-01349-TSE-
JFA (E.D. Va. July 7, 2020). In addition, we deny as unnecessary Jackson’s motion for a
certificate of appealability and deny his motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.