The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7269•United States of America v. Patrick Jerome Boyd, a/k/a LD
20-7269Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 22, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7269
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PATRICK JEROME BOYD, a/k/a LD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:10-cr-00072-MOC-1)
Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: December 22, 2020
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Jerome Boyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Jerome Boyd appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). After reviewing the record, we
conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.
See United States v. Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020) (stating standard of
review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Boyd, No. 3:10-cr-00072-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2020). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.