The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7347•United States of America v. John Mark Fisher
20-7347Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 5, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7347
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOHN MARK FISHER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Senior District Judge. (7:01-cr-00067-GEC-1)
Submitted: February 16, 2021 Decided: April 5, 2021
Before KING, KEENAN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Mark Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Barish Swartz, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Mark Fisher, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying
without prejudice Fisher’s motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391,
§ 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Fisher, No. 7:01-cr-00067-GEC-1 (W.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2020). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.