The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7386•United States of America v. Ronald Chisholm
20-7386Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 6, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7386
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RONALD CHISHOLM,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:14-cr-00132-LRL-1)
Submitted: June 10, 2021 Decided: July 6, 2021
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Chisholm, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Chisholm appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step
Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After reviewing the
record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
Chisholm’s motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating
standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Chisholm, No. 2:14-cr-00132-LRL-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 25, 2020). We deny
Chisholm’s motion to amend or correct his compassionate release motion. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.