The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7403•United States of America v. Guillermo Salazar-Velasquez
20-7403Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 31, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7403
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GUILLERMO SALAZAR-VELASQUEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:08-cr-00904-RMG-1)
Submitted: March 9, 2021 Decided: March 31, 2022
Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD,* Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Guillermo Salazar-Velasquez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
* Judge Floyd has dissented in this opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Guillermo Salazar-Velasquez appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions
for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Salazar-Velasquez, No. 2:08-cr-00904-RMG-1 (D.S.C. Sept. 8 & Oct. 26, 2020). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.