The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7500•Clarence L. Rhodes v. BRYAN K. DOBBS, Warden
20-7500Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 17, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7500
CLARENCE L. RHODES,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
BRYAN K. DOBBS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken.
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-01725-JFA-SVH)
Submitted: February 12, 2021 Decided: February 17, 2021
Before KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence L. Rhodes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clarence L. Rhodes appeals the district court’s orders affirming the magistrate
judge’s order denying his motion for bond pending a decision on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
petition and denying reconsideration.∗ We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rhodes v. Dobbs,
No. 1:20-cv-01725-JFA-SVH (D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2020). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to the collateral order doctrine. See
Stack v. Boyle, 342 U.S. 1, 12 (1951); Pagan v. United States, 353 F.3d 1343, 1345-46 &
n.4 (11th Cir. 2003).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.