The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7629•United States of America v. Shirley Ingram, a/k/a Raheem
20-7629Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 20, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7629
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SHIRLEY INGRAM, a/k/a Raheem,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:10-cr-00069-FDW-1)
Submitted: March 31, 2021 Decided: April 20, 2021
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shirley Ingram, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Shirley Ingram appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First
Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. See United States v. Ingram, No. 3:10-cr-00069-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 14, 2020).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.