The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7696•Wayne Resper v. Wexford Medical Services
20-7696Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 20, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7696
WAYNE RESPER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES; NURSE BRENDA REECE; NURSE
BEVERLY MCLAUGHLIN; NURSE CARLA BUCK; ALAN WILT; DIANE
HENSEL; BERNICE; RYAN BROWNING; RICHARD GRAHAM, JR., Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:17-cv-02014-PJM)
Submitted: August 18, 2022 Decided: September 20, 2022
Before AGEE, THACKER, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne Resper, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Conrad Meister, Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS,
RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale Park, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wayne Resper appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Resper v. Wexford Med. Servs., Inc.,
No. 8:17-cv-02014-PJM (D. Md. Sept. 21, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.