The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7705•United States of America v. Kahuntas Chapman, a/k/a Pie Face
20-7705Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 19, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7705
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KAHUNTAS CHAPMAN, a/k/a Pie Face,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (8:11-cr-02356-JMC-4)
Submitted: January 3, 2022 Decided: January 19, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kahuntas Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. William Jacob Watkins, Jr., OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kahuntas Chapman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step
Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. Having reviewed the
record and finding no reversible error, we affirm the decision of the district court. See
United States v. Chapman, No. 8:11-cr-02356-JMC-4 (D.S.C. Oct. 28, 2020). We grant
Chapman’s motion to supplement his informal brief and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.