The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7707•Joshua Anderson v. Mark Bolster
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7707
JOSHUA ANDERSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MARK BOLSTER,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00075-LO-TCB)
Submitted: July 26, 2022 Decided: Octcober 4, 2022
Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joshua Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew James Mezger, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joshua Gary Anderson appeals from the district court’s orders denying relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged his convictions by a general
court-martial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant Anderson’s motions to file supplemental informal briefs, we affirm the
court’s orders. Anderson v. Bolster, No. 1:19-cv-00075-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2020;
filed Aug. 27, 2020 & entered Aug. 28, 2020). We deny Anderson’s motion to substitute
party, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.