The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7747•United States of America v. Kanika T. Wiggins, a/k/a Kanika T. Johnson, a/k/a Kanika T. Johnson- Robbins
20-7747Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 9, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7747
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KANIKA T. WIGGINS, a/k/a Kanika T. Johnson, a/k/a Kanika T. Johnson-
Robbins,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:19-cr-00095-RGD-DEM-1)
Submitted: February 26, 2021 Decided: March 9, 2021
Before RICHARDSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kanika T. Wiggins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kanika T. Wiggins appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her third
motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by
the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239, and her
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Wiggins, No. 2:19-cr-00095-RGD-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 23, 2020; Oct. 15, 2020). We
also deny Wiggins’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.