The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7761•United States of America v. Jimmy Lawrence Nance
20-7761Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 22, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7761
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:92-cr-00135-JPJ-1)
Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 22, 2021
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Cagle Juhan, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jimmy Lawrence Nance appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First Step
Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239, and denying his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Nance,
No. 7:92-cr-00135-JPJ-1 (W.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2020; Nov. 4, 2020). We deny Nance’s
motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.