The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7763•United States of America v. Okale Daniels, a/k/a Bodie, a/k/a Opie
20-7763Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7763
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
OKALE DANIELS, a/k/a Bodie, a/k/a Opie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:13-cr-00011-BO-1)
Submitted: August 17, 2021 Decided: August 27, 2021
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Okale Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney,
Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Okale Daniels appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We review a district court’s
denial of a motion for compassionate release for abuse of discretion. United States v.
Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Daniels, No. 7:13-cr-00011-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 12, 2020). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.