Larry Arnold Young v. T. A. LACY, Deputy Sheriff

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7779
LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
T. A. LACY, Deputy Sheriff,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
PERRY RICHMOND, Mercer County Sheriff's Department; AARON YOUNG,
Mercer County Sheriff's Department,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-03633)
Submitted: May 20, 2021 Decided: May 24, 2021
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Arnold Young, Appellant Pro Se. Drannon L. Adkins, Wendy Elizabeth Greve,
PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN & POE, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Larry Arnold Young appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to retain
the case on the active docket and granting the defendant’s motion to enforce the settlement
agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny Lacy’s motion to strike Young’s pro se supplemental brief and we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Young v. Lacy, No. 1:17-cv-03633 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 3,
2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --