The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7792•Derrick Michael Allen, Sr. v. BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY AND LEONARD LLP; KEARNS DAVIS, Attorney
20-7792Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 3, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7792
DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY AND LEONARD LLP;
KEARNS DAVIS, Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:20-cv-00978-TDS-LPA)
Submitted: April 27, 2021 Decided: May 3, 2021
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
Allen’s complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal
Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Allen’s motion for a transcript at government
expense and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Allen v. Brooks, Pierce,
McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard LLP, No. 1:20-cv-00978-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Nov. 20,
2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.