The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7798•United States of America v. Mark Watkins
20-7798Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 2, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7798
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARK WATKINS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:94-cr-00066-JPB-1)
Submitted: October 8, 2021 Decided: November 2, 2021
Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Watkins, Appellant Pro Se. Eleanor F. Hurney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mark Watkins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United
States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 330-32 (4th Cir. 2021) (per curiam); United States v. High,
997 F.3d 181, 185-91 (4th Cir. 2021); United States v. Watkins, No. 5:94-cr-00066-JPB-1
(N.D.W. Va. Nov. 18, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.