The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-7905•John Maurice Henoud v. Warden T. Scarantino
20-7905Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 17, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7905
JOHN MAURICE HENOUD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN T. SCARANTINO,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:20-hc-02038-FL)
Submitted: November 10, 2021 Decided: November 17, 2021
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Maurice Henoud, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Maurice Henoud appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 petition seeking to challenge his federal convictions for lack of jurisdiction.∗ We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Henoud v. Scarantino, No. 5:20-hc-02038-FL
(E.D.N.C. Nov. 25, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ On appeal, Henoud has notified this court that he was placed in home confinement
pursuant to the CARES Act, but he remains in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons. See
United States v. Saunders, 986 F.3d 1076, 1078 (7th Cir. 2021).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.