Daryl A. Green v. Prince George’s County Office of Child Support Enforcement

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1036
DARYL A. GREEN,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT
ENFORCEMENT; PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION,
Creditors - Appellees,
and
TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN,
Trustee.
No. 21-1047
DARYL ANTHONY GREEN,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT,
Creditor - Appellee,
and

-- 1 of 4 --

2
TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN,
Trustee.
No. 21-1048
DARYL ANTHONY GREEN,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT,
Creditor - Appellee,
and
TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN,
Trustee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:20-cv-01201-TDC; 8:19-cv-03449-TDC; 8:20-
cv-01765-TDC)
Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 22, 2021
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 2 of 4 --

3
Daryl A. Green, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Hess Rohrbaugh, Assistant Attorney General,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 3 of 4 --

4
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Daryl A. Green appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his separate appeals from the bankruptcy court’s orders:
(1) denying without prejudice his motion to compel discovery (No. 21-1036); (2) denying
his motion to dismiss the Creditor’s proof of claim (No. 21-1047); and (3) denying his
motion to dismiss the Creditor’s motion to dismiss his bankruptcy case (No. 21-1048). We
have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Green v. Prince George’s Cnty. Ofc. of Child Support
Enf’t, Nos. 8:20-cv-01201-TDC, 8:19-cv-3449-TDC, 8:20-cv-01765-TDC (D. Md. Dec.
23, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 4 of 4 --