Muzem Acha Titus v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

21-1191Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 20, 2022

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1191
MUZEM ACHA TITUS,
Petitioner,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: August 29, 2022 Decided: September 20, 2022
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Danielle L.C. Beach, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW
ASSOCIATES PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant
Attorney General, Shelley Goad, Assistant Director, Kristin Moresi, Trial Attorney, Office
of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Muzem Acha Titus, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an
order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the
Immigration Judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal,
and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have thoroughly
reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to
any of the administrative factual findings, see U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial
evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re
Titus (B.I.A. Jan. 27, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.