The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-1194•Matthew O’reilly v. ADAM TSOTTLES, Route Manager, Waste Management; WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.
21-1194Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 29, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1194
MATTHEW O’REILLY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ADAM TSOTTLES, Route Manager, Waste Management; WASTE
MANAGEMENT, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:18-cv-03622-GLR)
Submitted: April 20, 2023 Decided: May 1, 2023
Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew O’Reilly, Appellant Pro Se. Geoffrey M. Gamble, SAUL EWING LLP,
Baltimore, Maryland; John F. Stoviak, SAUL EWING LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Matthew O’Reilly appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action for
failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and denying reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. O’Reilly
v. Tsottles, No. 1:18-cv-03622-GLR (D. Md., Mar. 30, 2020 & Feb. 8, 2021). We deny
O’Reilly’s motion for partial summary affirmance. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.