In re: Raymond Edward Chestnut, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1234
In re: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1)
Submitted: August 19, 2021 Decided: August 23, 2021
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Edward Chestnut, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Edward Chestnut petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the
district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for reconsideration of the district
court’s order granting in part and denying in part Chestnut’s “Amended Motion for Re-
Sentencing Under First Step Act of 2018.” He seeks an order from this court directing the
district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court
dismissed the motion for reconsideration on March 4, 2021. Accordingly, because the
district court has recently ruled on Chestnut’s motion for reconsideration, we deny the
mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --