In re: Terron Gerhard Dizzley

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1278
In re: TERRON GERHARD DIZZLEY,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:20-cv-00126-JD)
Submitted: June 24, 2021 Decided: June 28, 2021
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terron Gerhard Dizzley, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Terron Gerhard Dizzley, a state prisoner, petitions for a writ of mandamus. He
asserts that his convictions violated the Double Jeopardy Clause and requests an order
compelling his immediate release from incarceration. We conclude that Dizzley is not
entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown,
LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when
the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and “has no other adequate means to
attain the relief [he] desires,” Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795 (alteration and internal
quotation marks omitted), and mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal, In re
Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).
The relief sought by Dizzley is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly,
we deny the petition for writ of mandamus, deny Dizzley’s motion requesting “an answer
on the merits” of his petition, and deny his motion for “an expedited hearing.” We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --