The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-1350•GEORGE L. FARMER, Esq. v. J. LAURENCE KENT, Esq.
21-1350Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 27, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1350
GEORGE L. FARMER, Esq.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. LAURENCE KENT, Esq.; JOHN KIDWELL, Esq.; KIDWELL & KENT, a
Maryland Partnership, individually, jointly and severally,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:20-cv-01806-TDC)
Submitted: August 9, 2022 Decided: September 27, 2022
Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George L. Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Nachowitz Steel, WILSON ELSER
MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DECKER LLP, Washington, D.C.; Robert William Burton,
Alvin Frederick, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
George L. Farmer appeals the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motion to
dismiss his amended complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Farmer v. Kent, No. 8:20-cv-01806-TDC (D. Md. Feb. 23, 2021). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.