Shawn Houslin v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

21-1404Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 1, 2022

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1404
SHAWN HOUSLIN,
Petitioner,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted: January 20, 2022 Decided: February 1, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shawn Houslin, Petitioner Pro Se. Brendan Paul Hogan, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Shawn Houslin, a native and citizen of Jamaica, petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration
Judge’s decision denying his request for deferral of removal under the Convention Against
Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Houslin’s
merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not
compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, see Gomis v.
Holder, 571 F.3d 353, 359 (4th Cir. 2009); Dankam v. Gonzales, 495 F.3d 113, 124 (4th
Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the
Board. See In re Houslin (B.I.A. Mar. 17, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.