The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-1507•Derrick Mike Allen, Sr. v. Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, Llp
21-1507Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 23, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1507
DERRICK MIKE ALLEN, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, LLP; KEARNS
DAVIS; DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY; SHERIFF CLARENCE
F. BIRKHEAD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:20-cv-01173-TDS-LPA)
Submitted: August 19, 2021 Decided: August 23, 2021
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derrick Mike Allen, Sr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Allen’s civil rights complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Allen v. Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey &
Leonard LLP., No. 1:20-cv-01173-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 2021). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.