The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-1624•James Thomas Martin, Jr. v. Town of Summerville; Nancy Sumersett
21-1624Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 30, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1624
JAMES THOMAS MARTIN, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TOWN OF SUMMERVILLE; NANCY SUMERSETT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:19-cv-00774-RMG)
Submitted: January 31, 2023 Decided: March 30, 2023
Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Thomas Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Drew Hamilton Butler, Charleston, South
Carolina, Carmen Vaughn Ganjehsani, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Thomas Martin, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’
motion for summary judgment on Martin’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title II of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000a. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Martin v. Town of
Summerville, No. 2:19-cv-00774-RMG (D.S.C. May 21, 2021). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.