The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-1685•Joann Artis Stevens v. Town of Snow Hill, Nc; County of Greene, Nc; Lenoir Community College & Foundation, Nc
21-1685Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 4, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1685
JOANN ARTIS STEVENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TOWN OF SNOW HILL, NC; COUNTY OF GREENE, NC; LENOIR
COMMUNITY COLLEGE & FOUNDATION, NC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Greenville. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (4:19-cv-00156-D)
Submitted: September 28, 2022 Decided: November 4, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
JoAnn Artis Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine Marie Barber-Jones, Dan M. Hartzog,
Jr., HARTZOG LAW GROUP LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; James R. Morgan, Jr.,
WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; William
John Cathcart, Jr., BROWN, CRUMP, VANORE & TIERNEY, PLLC, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
JoAnn Artis Stevens appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions
to dismiss and dismissing Stevens’ civil complaint. Limiting our review of the record to
the issues raised in Stevens’ informal brief, we have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir.
2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our
review is limited to issues preserved in that brief”). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. Stevens v. Town of Snow Hill, No. 4:19-cv-00156-D (E.D.N.C. June 8,
2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.