Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr. v. Dva

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1695
ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DVA; REGIONAL VA OFFICE MARTINSBURG; JANESVILLE CLAIMS INTAKE
CENTER; PHILADELPHIA PENSION CENTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:21-cv-00022-GMG)
Submitted: January 4, 2022 Decided: January 20, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hairston v. DVA,
No. 3:21-cv-00022-GMG (N.D.W. Va. June 8, 2021). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --