The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-1709•Inam Naji v. Fluor Federal Services, LLC
21-1709Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 31, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1709
INAM NAJI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FLUOR FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:19-cv-01774-HMH)
Submitted: December 30, 2022 Decided: January 31, 2023
Before HARRIS and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Inam Naji, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Lee Sease Cluverius, Ashley Robertson Parr,
Greenville, South Carolina, Susan Pedrick McWilliams, NEXSEN PRUET, LLC,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Inam Naji appeals the district court’s order granting a directed verdict for Fluor
Federal Services, LLC, (Fluor) on Naji’s retaliation claim under Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § § 2000e to 2000e-17, and the court’s order
granting summary judgment to Fluor on Naji’s discrimination claims. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. Naji v. Fluor Fed. Servs., LLC, No. 6:19-cv-01774-HMH (D.S.C. June 4,
2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.