The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-1733•In re: Antonio Parnell, a/k/a Antonio Jones, a/k/a Anthony Shaw, a/k/a Jerry L. Cagle
21-1733Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 17, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1733
In re: ANTONIO PARNELL, a/k/a Antonio Jones, a/k/a Anthony Shaw, a/k/a Jerry L.
Cagle,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:20-cv-00145; 2:18-cr-00147-1)
Submitted: September 14, 2021 Decided: September 17, 2021
Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Parnell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Parnell petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the magistrate judge
has unduly delayed in acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket sheet
reveals that the magistrate judge recently took significant action on Parnell’s § 2255
motion. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.