The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-1748•James Beggs; Joyce Beggs v. Geico Insurance Agency; Cunningham Lindsey U.s. Inc.
21-1748Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 28, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1748
JAMES BEGGS; JOYCE BEGGS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY; CUNNINGHAM LINDSEY U.S. INC.,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, d/b/a
Assurant, et al.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:17-cv-00110-AWA-DEM)
Submitted: June 29, 2022 Decided: June 28, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Beggs, Joyce Beggs, Appellants Pro Se.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
James and Joyce Beggs (“Appellants”) appeal the district court’s order denying their
postjudgment motion for reconsideration. Limiting our review to the issues raised in
Appellants’ informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177
(4th Cir. 2014), we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Beggs v. Am. Banker Ins. Co., No. 4:17-cv-00110-
AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. June 29, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.