The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-1761•Michael E. Hernandez v. B. Johnson; Sergeant Gardner; Felix Taylor; Correctional Officer Adams; Charlotte Evans
21-1761Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 20, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1761
MICHAEL E. HERNANDEZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
B. JOHNSON; SERGEANT GARDNER; FELIX TAYLOR; CORRECTIONAL
OFFICER ADAMS; CHARLOTTE EVANS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:19-ct-03399-M)
Submitted: August 18, 2022 Decided: August 22, 2022
Before WYNN, THACKER, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael E. Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael E. Hernandez appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint and denying his motion to appoint counsel. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Hernandez v. Johnson, No. 5:19-ct-03399-M (E.D.N.C. June 9, 2021). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.