The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-1819•James Joseph Owens-El v. Maggie Chou
21-1819Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 22, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1819
JAMES JOSEPH OWENS-EL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MAGGIE CHOU; KEVIN RANDALL; LETTA REID-TRAGDON; RENATA
STOKES; PAUL O’CONNOR; MACK ABADUDO; JUDITH TOM LIN; STATE
OF MARYLAND; COUNCILMAN ERIC COSTELLO; JOHN DOE NO. ONE;
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOHN DOE NO. 2; UNKNOWN JUDGE; MR.
KEITH; MR. HEINZ,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen Lipton Hollander, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00675-ELH)
Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: February 22, 2022
Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Joseph Owens-El, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Joseph Owens-El appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action
for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Owens-El v. Chou, No.
1:21-cv-00675-ELH (D. Md. May 24, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.