In re: Antonio Shropshire, a/k/a Brill, a/k/a B, a/k/a Tony

21-1828Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 13, 2021

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1828
In re: ANTONIO SHROPSHIRE, a/k/a Brill, a/k/a B, a/k/a Tony,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:16-cr-00051-CCB-3; 1:21-cv-00202-CCB)
Submitted: September 9, 2021 Decided: September 13, 2021
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Shropshire, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Shropshire petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court
has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for an expedited hearing on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255
motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of
the district court’s docket reveals that the district court recently took significant action on
Shropshire’s motion by ordering a response from the Government. Accordingly, we deny
the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.