The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-1870•Michael E. Kennedy v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
21-1870Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 22, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1870
MICHAEL E. KENNEDY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:21-cv-01569-ELH)
Submitted: December 21, 2021 Decided: December 22, 2021
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Edward Kennedy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael E. Kennedy appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a
writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. See Kennedy v. Garland, No. 1:21-cv-01569-ELH (D.
Md. June 28, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.