The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-1982•Rudolph Benjamin Lavarne Whitehurst v. Teresa Deloatch Bryant
21-1982Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 12, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1982
RUDOLPH BENJAMIN LAVARNE WHITEHURST,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TERESA DELOATCH BRYANT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Greenville. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (4:20-cv-00179-M)
Submitted: June 28, 2022 Decided: July 12, 2022
Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rudolph Benjamin Lavarn Whitehurst, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Jansen Banfield,
HARRIS, CREECH, WARD & BLACKERBY, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rudolph Whitehurst appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action
without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Whitehurst v. Bryant, No. 4:20-cv-00179-M (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2021). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.