Rachael L. Cook v. Scott McQuate

21-2038Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 6, 2023

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2038
RACHAEL L. COOK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCOTT MCQUATE,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
THE OHIO COMPANY; JOHN RICHARD BLAZER,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:15-cv-00456-MFU-RSB)
Submitted: April 27, 2023 Decided: September 6, 2023
Before WYNN and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Henry W. McLaughlin, III, Esq., LAW OFFICE OF HENRY
MCLAUGHLIN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Rachael L. Cook appeals from a civil judgment entered after a jury found she failed
to prove her fraud and related claims against Scott McQuate, along with the district court’s
denial of her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. On appeal, Cook challenges the district court’s
construction of McQuate’s late answer to a request for admissions as a motion under Fed.
R. Civ. P. 36(b) to withdraw and the court’s decision to grant that motion. We have
reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion.
Accordingly, we affirm. Cook v. McQuate, No. 7:15-cv-00456-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. filed
May 15, 2018 & entered May 16, 2018; July 23, 2018). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.