Maureen Kateri Corneal v. DEBRA MCCURDY, Ph. D.; KURT SCHMOKE; MICHELLE WILLIAMS; MARIA RODRIGUEZ

21-2063Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 13, 2022

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2063
MAUREEN KATERI CORNEAL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEBRA MCCURDY, Ph. D.; KURT SCHMOKE; MICHELLE WILLIAMS;
MARIA RODRIGUEZ,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-03393-RDB)
Submitted: August 25, 2022 Decided: October 13, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Maureen Kateri Corneal, Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Joyce Bradley, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Maureen Kateri Corneal appeals the district court’s order granting summary
judgment against her on her claim of age discrimination related to the termination of her
employment. See 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Corneal v. McCurdy,
No. 1:19-cv-03393-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 15, 2021). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.