Donat Caleb Porter v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

21-2093Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 28, 2022

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2093
DONAT CALEB PORTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General; JOSHUA STEIN, Attorney General
of North Carolina; ROXANN H. VANEEKHOVEN; JENNIFER M. TAYLOR;
CASEY E. WALLACE; MARTIN B. MCGEE; DAVID BRENT CLONINGER;
BENJAMIN G. GOFF; VAN SHAW; DAVID BRADSON RILEY; JOSH W.
HELMS; JAMES N. BAILEY; KEVIN PFISTER; DUSTIN GROOMS; JAMES
ROMINGER; CITY OF CONCORD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:20-cv-00573-LCB-JEP)
Submitted: March 23, 2022 Decided: July 28, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donat Caleb Porter, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Martin Koch, LAW OFFICES OF
RICHARD M. KOCH, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina; Steven Andrew Bader, Raleigh,
North Carolina, Patrick Houghton Flanagan, CRANFILL SUMNER, LLP, Charlotte,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Donat Caleb Porter appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his
civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. Porter v. Garland, No. 1:20-cv-00573-LCB-JEP (M.D.N.C. Aug.
6, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.