Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.p.; Hewlett-Packard Company, “hp,”

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2094
MARIE THERESE ASSA’AD-FALTAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.; HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, “HP,”
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-03563-TLW)
Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 22, 2022
Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se. Regina Hollins Lewis, Randi Lynn
Roberts, GAFFNEYLEWIS, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II,
WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s orders (1) accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny Assa’ad-Faltas’ summary judgment motion
and grant summary judgment in favor of Defendants on Assa’ad-Faltas’ state law civil
claims; and (2) denying Assa’ad-Faltas’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders.
See Assa’ad-Faltas v. Wal-Mart Stores E., L.P., No. 3:18-cv-03563-TLW (D.S.C. filed
June 1, 2021 & entered June 2, 2021; Sept. 28, 2021). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --