The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-2112•Derrick Allen v. LAWRENCE M. CAMPBELL, Public Defender
21-2112Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 22, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2112
DERRICK ALLEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LAWRENCE M. CAMPBELL, Public Defender; DAWN Y. BAXTON, Assistant
Public Defender; ROBERT BROWN, JR., Ex-Public Defender; GRETCHEN M.
ENGEL, Executive Director; JAY FERGUSON, Past President (Center for Death
Penalty Litigation); DONALD H. BESKIND, President for the Center of Death
Penalty Litigation; STEPHEN C. FREEDMAN, Ex Staff Attorney for CDPL/ Now
Assistant Capital Defender; DURHAM COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER’S
OFFICE; CENTER FOR DEATH PENALTY LITIGATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00765-TDS-LPA)
Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: February 22, 2022
Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Michael Allen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derrick Allen appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing Allen’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Allen v. Campbell, No. 1:19-cv-
00765-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.