Ilonka Aylward v. City of Charlotte; Armstrong Glen, P.c.; Joseph H. Letourneau

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2156
ILONKA AYLWARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF CHARLOTTE; ARMSTRONG GLEN, P.C.; JOSEPH H.
LETOURNEAU,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG STORM WATER SERVICES, a/k/a Charlotte
Stormwater Services, a/k/a Charlotte/Mecklenburg Storm Water, a/k/a Charlotte
Storm Water Services, a/k/a City of Charlotte Storm Water Services,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:21-cv-00232-MOC-DSC)
Submitted: March 23, 2023 Decided: April 13, 2023
Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Ilonka Aylward, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Edward Powers, III, Senior Assistant City
Attorney, Clarence Edward Matherson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY,
Charlotte, North Carolina; Sandra W. Mitterling, Amie Carol Sivon, RAGSDALE
LIGGETT, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Ilonka Aylward has filed an appeal from the district court’s order denying her
Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Prohibitive Preliminary Injunction.
Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction on the ground
that they have finished the activities Aylward sought to enjoin and that the appeal is now
moot. Aylward opposes the motion. Upon review of the materials relative to this appeal,
we grant the Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal as moot. See Di Biase
v. SPX Corp., 872 F.3d 224, 231 (4th Cir. 2017). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --