The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-2192•Vance Byrd v. Asher Wolf; Johnny Hsieh; Bill Gall; Empire Resources, Inc.
21-2192Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 14, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2192
VANCE BYRD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ASHER WOLF; JOHNNY HSIEH; BILL GALL; EMPIRE RESOURCES, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-01873-DKC)
Submitted: September 27, 2022 Decided: October 14, 2022
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vance Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Courtney Renee Abbott, GORDON REES SCULLY
MANSUKHANI, LLP, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Vance Byrd appeals the district court’s order granting judgment in favor of
Defendants after a bench trial was conducted on Byrd’s retaliation claims, brought pursuant
to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17.
We have reviewed the record and discern no error by the district court. We therefore affirm
the district court’s order. Byrd v. Wolf, No. 1:19-cv-01873-DKC (D. Md. Sept. 24, 2021).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.