The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-2209•Lawrence Eliot Mattison v. Janie Deborah Willis
21-2209Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 13, 2022
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2209
LAWRENCE ELIOT MATTISON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JANIE DEBORAH WILLIS; SHERRY ANN ZAMORA; TIMOTHY MARTIN
O’BOYLE; ADRIANE RACHELLE MAUNEY; EMILY SUZANNE HUNT;
TONYA HENDERSON-STITH; BONNIE LOUISE JONES; BARBARA
TIMMENEY HANNA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:17-cv-00134-RGD-DEM)
Submitted: March 31, 2022 Decided: April 13, 2022
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Eliot Mattison, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin M. Mason, MASON, MASON,
WALKER & HEDRICK, PC, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee Barbara Timmeney
Hanna.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Eliot Mattison appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed.
R. Civ. P. 60(d)(3) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order. Mattison v. Willis, No. 4:17-cv-00134-RGD-
DEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.