The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-2304•Harry Hill v. B. Frank Joy, L.l.c.
21-2304Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 17, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2304
HARRY HILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
B. FRANK JOY, L.L.C.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:16-cv-01707-TDC; 8:15-cv-01123-TDC)
Submitted: June 15, 2023 Decided: June 20, 2023
Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harry Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Maurice Baskin, Brandon Robert Mita, LITTLER
MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Harry Hill appeals the district court’s order granting Appellee’s motion for sanctions
and dismissing Hill’s complaints pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v). We have
reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
dismissing the actions. See Nat’l Hockey League v. Metro. Hockey Club, 427 U.S. 639,
642 (1976) (providing standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Hill v.
B. Frank Joy, L.L.C., Nos. 8:16-cv-01707-TDC; 8:15-cv-01123-TDC (D. Md.
Nov. 8, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.